Understanding Multi-Touch Attribution Models

Life is full of mysteries - like 'What does the fox say?' and 'Who gets credit for this campaign's leads?' Thanks to multi-touch attribution, at least one of those questions finally has an answer! More often than not, customer journeys span multiple channels and devices, and attributing conversions to the right touchpoints has become more critical than ever. 

The days of single-touch attribution have almost disappeared as more organizations realize the importance of understanding a customer's journey before purchasing. Enter the multi-touch attribution model, a data-driven approach to assigning credit across all touchpoints that contribute to a conversion.

This blog will explore a clear path toward a well-rounded understanding of multi-touch attribution.

TL;DR

• Multi-touch attribution assigns credit for conversions across multiple touchpoints, allowing businesses to identify the most effective channels and interactions.
• The Linear Attribution Model assigns equal credit to every touchpoint in the customer journey.
• Time Decay Attribution gives more credit to recent touchpoints, emphasizing interactions closer to the conversion.
• U-shaped attribution places higher credit on the first and last interactions, with reduced weight on mid-journey touchpoints.
• W-shaped attribution assigns credit to the first interaction, a lead creation point, and the final touchpoint, with some credit to other interactions.
• Factors enables brands to build and analyze these models, offering data-driven insights for more effective marketing strategies.
• Multi-touch attribution helps marketers understand each touchpoint's impact, improving budget allocation and strategic planning.

What is Multi-Touch Attribution?

Multi-touch attribution (MTA) distributes credit for conversions across multiple customer interactions with a brand before completing a desired action, such as a purchase or sign-up. Unlike single-touch models, which assign credit solely to the first or last interaction, multi-touch attribution acknowledges that each touchpoint may guide a customer toward conversion.

Multi-touch attribution is not just a data model; it’s a mindset shift. It recognizes that customers no longer have a linear path to purchase. A potential buyer might interact with an email campaign, engage with social media ads, and click on a Google search ad before finally converting. Assigning credit to each of these touchpoints, rather than just the last one, helps brands understand the total value of their marketing efforts.

Why is Multi-Touch Attribution Important?

Customer journeys are complex and non-linear. Traditional single-touch models oversimplify this journey and may result in inaccurate credit assignments, leading to:

1. Misallocation of Budget: If only the last touchpoint receives credit, you might prioritize channels that close conversions, even if other channels contribute heavily to the customer journey.
2. Unoptimized Marketing Mix: By understanding the contribution of each touchpoint, marketers can gain insights to optimize campaigns.
3. Limited Insight on Customer Behavior: Multi-touch attribution helps marketers understand how different channels and content types influence customers at various funnel stages.

Multi-touch attribution provides insights into the buyer journey and allows brands to optimize each stage, ensuring that no touchpoint goes unnoticed.

Types of Multi-Touch Attribution Models

Different multi-touch attribution models distribute credit in various ways. Here are the main types:

1. Linear Attribution Model

The Linear Attribution Model treats every interaction equally, distributing credit across all touchpoints contributing to a conversion. In a linear model, if a customer’s journey includes four touchpoints, each will receive 25% of the credit.

When to Use It

The linear model is useful when:

• You want a simple view of the customer journey.
• Each touchpoint plays a consistent role in moving prospects through the funnel.
• Your goal is to assess the overall influence of each channel rather than prioritize one over the other.

Strengths and Weaknesses

• Strengths: Simple, easy to understand, and provides a balanced view of the customer journey. It’s beneficial for campaigns with several smaller, interdependent touchpoints.
• Weaknesses: Overemphasizes touchpoints that may not significantly impact conversion, as each touchpoint gets equal weight regardless of its influence.

‍

2. Time Decay Attribution Model

In the Time Decay Attribution Model, credit is distributed based on the proximity of each touchpoint to the conversion event. The closer the interaction is to the conversion, the more weight it receives. For example, a touchpoint that happened two days before a purchase would get more credit than one that occurred a month prior.

When to Use It

Time decay is ideal when:

• Your sales cycle is relatively short, and recent touchpoints are crucial in driving conversions.
• You have a specific nurturing process where late-stage interactions are more influential in closing the sale.
• Your business wants to emphasize the impact of interactions that push a customer toward conversion.

Strengths and Weaknesses

• Strengths: Better reflects the role of closing touchpoints, particularly in shorter sales cycles.
• Weaknesses: Can under-credit early touchpoints, which may have initially captured the customer’s attention and set the stage for conversion.

3. U-Shaped (Position-Based) Attribution Model

The U-Shaped Attribution Model places the most weight on the first and last touchpoints while giving less credit to interactions that occur in between. Typically, 40% of the credit goes to the first interaction, another 40% to the final touchpoint, and the remaining 20% is equally divided among middle interactions. This model emphasizes the importance of initial awareness and the final conversion push.

When to Use It

The U-shaped model is useful for:

• Campaigns where initial engagement and final conversion activities, such as e-commerce or subscription services, are crucial.
• Understanding the impact of top-funnel and bottom-funnel activities in a funnel with distinct awareness and conversion stages.
• When the beginning and end of the journey are more critical than mid-funnel nurturing steps.

Strengths and Weaknesses

• Strengths: It recognizes the unique importance of introducing the brand and converting the lead, capturing the critical stages of awareness and decision-making.
• Weaknesses: It undervalues mid-funnel interactions that help nurture leads through consideration and interest phases.

‍

4. W-Shaped Attribution Model

The W-Shaped Attribution Model expands on the U-shaped model by placing significant weight on three key touchpoints: the first interaction, a mid-funnel lead conversion point, and the final interaction. Each touchpoint typically receives 30% of the credit, with the remaining 10% spread among any other touchpoints in between.

When to Use It

The W-shaped model is well-suited for:

• B2B businesses with complex customer journeys and distinct sales stages (e.g., initial awareness, lead qualification, and final purchase).
• Journeys where lead qualification or a specific milestone interaction (like a demo or trial sign-up) is pivotal.
• Brands that want to give appropriate credit to the customer journey's early, middle, and closing stages.

Strengths and Weaknesses

• Strengths: Provides a balanced approach for longer, more intricate sales cycles, particularly in B2B, where multiple stages are equally influential.
• Weaknesses: It may need to be more complex or weighted for simpler sales cycles, especially where a single touchpoint drives most of the conversion.

Building a Multi-Touch Attribution Model with Factors

With all the different multi-touch attribution models available, the question remains: how can brands build a model that provides accurate, actionable insights without overwhelming complexity? Factors offers a solution by simplifying the complex process of multi-touch attribution. Here’s how Factors assists marketers:

1. Data Integration

Factors connects to various data sources, aggregating touchpoints across channels. This includes data from ad platforms, CRM systems, and analytics tools, enabling a holistic view of the customer journey.

2. Pre-Built Attribution Models

The platform provides customizable multi-touch attribution models, making it easy for marketers to select a model that best suits their needs. Factors offers linear, time decay, and custom algorithmic models.

3. Visualization and Reporting

Factors turns raw data into visual insights, allowing marketers to see how different touchpoints contribute to conversions. This is crucial for presenting data to stakeholders and adjusting campaigns based on real-time insights.

4. Machine Learning Capabilities

For brands looking to implement algorithmic models, Factors leverages machine learning to predict channel effectiveness. This allows for more accurate credit distribution based on data-driven insights.

5. Real-Time Attribution Analysis

Factors provides real-time updates, allowing marketers to make informed decisions on the fly. This ensures that marketing efforts are continually optimized based on the latest customer interactions.

Factors Use Case: Building a Multi-Touch Attribution Model

Imagine a mid-market software company partnering with Factors to streamline its attribution process. This company needs help understanding the ROI of individual campaigns, relying on a last-touch attribution model that credits only the final touchpoint. As a result, channels like social media, which primarily influence the early stages of the customer journey, are undervalued.

Now, suppose the company adopts Factors’ multi-touch attribution model. They can now see how each channel contributes at different customer journey stages. Social media ads, previously deemed ineffective, would be recognized as key drivers of lead nurturing in the early stages. By leveraging a W-shaped attribution model, the company can allocate credit across initial, mid-funnel, and final interactions, showcasing the role of each channel in driving conversions.

Results with Factors:

• Enhanced Budget Allocation: With a clearer understanding of social media’s impact on early-stage awareness, the company can confidently invest more in this channel.
• Optimized Campaign Performance: Real-time data from Factors enables the company to adjust campaigns dynamically, improving conversion rates over time.
• Improved Client Reporting: Factors’ visual reports make highlighting the value of each touchpoint easier, helping clients appreciate the benefits of a multi-touch attribution approach.

In a Nutshell

Multi-touch attribution has become essential for understanding the modern customer journey. By accurately attributing value across multiple touchpoints, businesses can gain clarity on what works and what doesn’t, ensuring that every marketing dollar is well spent.

Using a platform like Factors makes building and analyzing a multi-touch attribution model accessible, even for those without extensive technical expertise. Whether you’re just starting with multi-touch attribution or looking to refine your current model, Factors’s tools, data integrations, and machine-learning capabilities offer a powerful way to gain insights, drive performance, and justify marketing investments.

With the right multi-touch attribution model, your brand can go beyond basic metrics and dive into actionable insights, ensuring every channel, ad, and interaction truly counts.